"Nearly everyone who “woke up” during covid is caught in this astral drama, being led around by polarizing bullshit." Indeed. We need a "second coming," waking up and staying awake this time. Grateful for your weekly nudges toward reality.
You went too far this time for me. They have the bullet and there was loads of blood splatter. If Charlie wasn’t killed, did he fly off to South America and leave his family?
My willing suspension of disbelief isn’t with you. I’m disappointed you let your personal government distrust interfere with being an astrologer.
Another Taurus (rising) now in your past,
Bonnie
(who provided no references showing blood spatter or to the recovery of the projectile from the crime scene...)
Thank you for pulling it altogether as an example of the violence addiction. I see it clearly now:
“...Once you see these problems, you have a choice of ongoing questioning, or the agitated slumber of polarization. If you’re whipped into a lather, you cannot think for yourself, or think at all. The less you know who you are, the better it will feel to be aggressive and polarized.”
SUPERB work, Eric and Cindy! Forget symbols, the shooting itself, the crime scene and its scrubbing, the moving of the body out of state,... all these SCREAM to the heavens, but hardly anyone seems to be listening.
"White House publication from Sept. 6, with Trump depicting himself as Lt. Col Thomas Kilgore from the film “Apocalypse Now”, threatening to “invade” Chicago, IL. Trump posted to Truth Social, “I love the smell of deportations in the morning,” referencing the most famous line from the 1979 film “Apocalypse Now.”""
"Charlie's gonna be a napalm star!" (From Charlie Don't Surf, the Clash, 1980).
Wow! It’s amazing to me how many people were ‘triggered’ around the CK “alleged assassination” event. Some went down the road of sadness, disbelief, anxiety and all around fell apart. Other people were ‘triggered’ in the opposite direction, of glee, happiness and were celebrating that Mr. Kirk was now dead.
Both were polar opposites, and a great example of the serious divide between people here in the USA.
You would think that people, after the scam of 9/11 wouldn’t trust any kind of ‘narrative’ that the Gubment (FBI) and The Authorities tried to spin. People fell for the BS once again! It’s sick (and not in the good way that that word can be used.)
Candace Owens says she saw the video provided to her by the guy who took down the camera from an active crime scene. She says she knew him personally from her days at TPUSA and still had his number in her phone and texted him. This part lasts 15 minutes right at the top. I am leading with the “no blood” angle and she says that in this up close pro quality video, there is no blood and she does not understand why. Well, I do.
I'm changing my comment because I watched the whole section now. So we have an alleged video that she allegedly saw and is telling us about, in the possession of a man who also violated Utah State Law. The image of Candace Owens not trusting "the feds" and telling this story is very compelling, but really there is nothing here, as I watch the views surge by the thousands over the minutes I'm watching.
It's long been speculated that she has been groomed and positioned as well, via her involvement in TPUSA. Who is benefiting from this video, what are we being distracted from?
Sometimes you can watch an entire video and pick up one salient fact. This video produces several. Please follow along:
First, a major presenter says she knows the guy who moved the camera and removed the card. So we have the potential to have this person identified.
Second, if what she is saying is true, investigators have not contacted him demanding that evidence, which has now been despoiled because the chain of custody has been broken. Further, they have not arrested him for messing with the crime scene; he committed a felony. This is an indication of the state of mind of investigators and the condition of the investigation.
Note, it is not up to someone who despoiled the crime scene to turn the evidence over. It is up to the investigators to demand that evidence and to do so immediately. But — no.
Third, a major presenter (Candace) claims to have seen the video many times and said that it's not what's in the video that is disturbing, but what is **not** in the video: no blood, no gore; this supports all other image analysis that says no blood no gore. So we are 100% on this. Nobody is claiming blood and gore and there are no photographs that include it. Had Kirk been hit in the neck with a .30-'06 it is likely his head would have been at last partially severed and at minimum there would be a spray pattern all around.
Last, if and when we see this video, we will need to scrutinize it, but there is one salient fact that supports my theory of the case: no blood, no gore. Those with experience in examining photographic evidence will no doubt see other things that she is not noticing. I am curious to see the focal length of the lens, which will define the width of the viewpoint.
Polarization is their game plan. I refuse to fall into the trap. No COVID, no assassins with questionably questionable motives, no plane-struck World Trade Center. Just a tweak of PR to control the masses, and the M is silent. Tail wags the dog and the audience are all wearing their 3-D glasses. Jeebus, we’re a gullible lot. F Chump and his handlers. The announcement is pure theater and absolutely AI generated. That should be proof positive that we’re being led down the garden path. Psycho killer, qu’est-ce que c’est?
Charlie’s wife, or so we are told. Incidentally, it is not unprecedented for the intelligence services to construct “arranged marriages” where an asset is wed to his or her handler. How did someone get so close to Erika and the supposed corpse to record her soto voce declarations of love? It reeks of stage craft.
The scaffolding being put into place prior to Trumpism over decades, we are witnessing full on fascism being deployed under Trump 2.0 supported by a digital panopticon of social control, the COVIDIAN reign of terror starting in 2020 a not insignificant factor in its rollout.
I would recommend the Council Estate Media Substack which also discusses these anomalies in some detail.
Everyone needs to go look at all the info on Kirk's shooting at rense dot com- he shows in the video footage that the guy near the stage in the tan plaid shirt had a palm pistol and shows when he shot it, even having a still frame of the actual bullet! The same guy then gets in the black SUV that they threw Charlie's body in. The caliber of bullet from that pistol would explain the lack of exit wound and why no blood was seen as those guys transported him on the gurney to the SUV.
I really am glad to see Bob Dobbs make an appearance. Hail Bob! The few clips I've seen of "Progressive students" arguing with Charlie Kirk, appear as extreme caricatures who don't even really understand their own arguments. It reminds me of one of the greatest propaganda films of all time Forrest Gump which painted hippies and activists as irresponsible not-so-bright children.
Bravo, Eric and Cindy.
"Nearly everyone who “woke up” during covid is caught in this astral drama, being led around by polarizing bullshit." Indeed. We need a "second coming," waking up and staying awake this time. Grateful for your weekly nudges toward reality.
I am indebted to my friend and faithful supporter Ali Prim for the observation about the covid awake going back to sleep...
VIA EMAIL
Eric,
You went too far this time for me. They have the bullet and there was loads of blood splatter. If Charlie wasn’t killed, did he fly off to South America and leave his family?
My willing suspension of disbelief isn’t with you. I’m disappointed you let your personal government distrust interfere with being an astrologer.
Another Taurus (rising) now in your past,
Bonnie
(who provided no references showing blood spatter or to the recovery of the projectile from the crime scene...)
Thank you for pulling it altogether as an example of the violence addiction. I see it clearly now:
“...Once you see these problems, you have a choice of ongoing questioning, or the agitated slumber of polarization. If you’re whipped into a lather, you cannot think for yourself, or think at all. The less you know who you are, the better it will feel to be aggressive and polarized.”
SUPERB work, Eric and Cindy! Forget symbols, the shooting itself, the crime scene and its scrubbing, the moving of the body out of state,... all these SCREAM to the heavens, but hardly anyone seems to be listening.
"White House publication from Sept. 6, with Trump depicting himself as Lt. Col Thomas Kilgore from the film “Apocalypse Now”, threatening to “invade” Chicago, IL. Trump posted to Truth Social, “I love the smell of deportations in the morning,” referencing the most famous line from the 1979 film “Apocalypse Now.”""
"Charlie's gonna be a napalm star!" (From Charlie Don't Surf, the Clash, 1980).
Wow! It’s amazing to me how many people were ‘triggered’ around the CK “alleged assassination” event. Some went down the road of sadness, disbelief, anxiety and all around fell apart. Other people were ‘triggered’ in the opposite direction, of glee, happiness and were celebrating that Mr. Kirk was now dead.
Both were polar opposites, and a great example of the serious divide between people here in the USA.
You would think that people, after the scam of 9/11 wouldn’t trust any kind of ‘narrative’ that the Gubment (FBI) and The Authorities tried to spin. People fell for the BS once again! It’s sick (and not in the good way that that word can be used.)
Candace Owens says she saw the video provided to her by the guy who took down the camera from an active crime scene. She says she knew him personally from her days at TPUSA and still had his number in her phone and texted him. This part lasts 15 minutes right at the top. I am leading with the “no blood” angle and she says that in this up close pro quality video, there is no blood and she does not understand why. Well, I do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDlhjfW6hz8
I'm changing my comment because I watched the whole section now. So we have an alleged video that she allegedly saw and is telling us about, in the possession of a man who also violated Utah State Law. The image of Candace Owens not trusting "the feds" and telling this story is very compelling, but really there is nothing here, as I watch the views surge by the thousands over the minutes I'm watching.
It's long been speculated that she has been groomed and positioned as well, via her involvement in TPUSA. Who is benefiting from this video, what are we being distracted from?
Sometimes you can watch an entire video and pick up one salient fact. This video produces several. Please follow along:
First, a major presenter says she knows the guy who moved the camera and removed the card. So we have the potential to have this person identified.
Second, if what she is saying is true, investigators have not contacted him demanding that evidence, which has now been despoiled because the chain of custody has been broken. Further, they have not arrested him for messing with the crime scene; he committed a felony. This is an indication of the state of mind of investigators and the condition of the investigation.
Note, it is not up to someone who despoiled the crime scene to turn the evidence over. It is up to the investigators to demand that evidence and to do so immediately. But — no.
Third, a major presenter (Candace) claims to have seen the video many times and said that it's not what's in the video that is disturbing, but what is **not** in the video: no blood, no gore; this supports all other image analysis that says no blood no gore. So we are 100% on this. Nobody is claiming blood and gore and there are no photographs that include it. Had Kirk been hit in the neck with a .30-'06 it is likely his head would have been at last partially severed and at minimum there would be a spray pattern all around.
Last, if and when we see this video, we will need to scrutinize it, but there is one salient fact that supports my theory of the case: no blood, no gore. Those with experience in examining photographic evidence will no doubt see other things that she is not noticing. I am curious to see the focal length of the lens, which will define the width of the viewpoint.
Polarization is their game plan. I refuse to fall into the trap. No COVID, no assassins with questionably questionable motives, no plane-struck World Trade Center. Just a tweak of PR to control the masses, and the M is silent. Tail wags the dog and the audience are all wearing their 3-D glasses. Jeebus, we’re a gullible lot. F Chump and his handlers. The announcement is pure theater and absolutely AI generated. That should be proof positive that we’re being led down the garden path. Psycho killer, qu’est-ce que c’est?
What an article! Who is Erika Kirk?
Charlie’s wife, or so we are told. Incidentally, it is not unprecedented for the intelligence services to construct “arranged marriages” where an asset is wed to his or her handler. How did someone get so close to Erika and the supposed corpse to record her soto voce declarations of love? It reeks of stage craft.
The scaffolding being put into place prior to Trumpism over decades, we are witnessing full on fascism being deployed under Trump 2.0 supported by a digital panopticon of social control, the COVIDIAN reign of terror starting in 2020 a not insignificant factor in its rollout.
I would recommend the Council Estate Media Substack which also discusses these anomalies in some detail.
Are you joking? 🤔😳
Lots of questions here...
Everyone needs to go look at all the info on Kirk's shooting at rense dot com- he shows in the video footage that the guy near the stage in the tan plaid shirt had a palm pistol and shows when he shot it, even having a still frame of the actual bullet! The same guy then gets in the black SUV that they threw Charlie's body in. The caliber of bullet from that pistol would explain the lack of exit wound and why no blood was seen as those guys transported him on the gurney to the SUV.
I really am glad to see Bob Dobbs make an appearance. Hail Bob! The few clips I've seen of "Progressive students" arguing with Charlie Kirk, appear as extreme caricatures who don't even really understand their own arguments. It reminds me of one of the greatest propaganda films of all time Forrest Gump which painted hippies and activists as irresponsible not-so-bright children.