I associate Democrats with the right of minors to undergo "gender affirming surgeries." The public servants have been given the task of dismantling the civilization and laying the grounds for the creating of synthetic humans.
I associate Democrats with the right of minors to undergo "gender affirming surgeries." The public servants have been given the task of dismantling the civilization and laying the grounds for the creating of synthetic humans.
It's gender affirming care, not surgeries. I haven't seen any numbers about Democrats being in favor of gfc. I'm not down with minors being able to do sex change surgeries with or without parental consent. I don't even like birth control pills because they mess with hormones. I don't think people should be able to do sex change procedures until their neocortex finishes developing. People who do this -- as adults -- are not "synthetic humans." Lord have mercy. They are still real humans who have changed their bodies to fit what they feel is best. Not for me, but then neither is the Trad Wife thing, which is 100% "natural." I associate sweeping generalizations with people who might not really be thinking things through. In any case, I am in favor of compassion as much as possible
The term "gender affirming care" sounds like it came out of a Frank Luntz focus group. It's sanitized, euphemistic language that negates the truth of genital mutilation, amputation, lifetime hormone treatments, and much else. The notion of allowing minor children with little to no experience of their bodies and sexualities is incomprehensible in any other paradigm than digital.
тАЬThe body is everywhere assaulted by all of our new media, a state which has resulted in deep disorientation of intellect and destabilization of culture throughout the world. In the age of disembodied communication, the meaning and significance and experience of the body is utterly transformed and distorted.тАЭ
I associate Democrats with the right of minors to undergo "gender affirming surgeries." The public servants have been given the task of dismantling the civilization and laying the grounds for the creating of synthetic humans.
It's gender affirming care, not surgeries. I haven't seen any numbers about Democrats being in favor of gfc. I'm not down with minors being able to do sex change surgeries with or without parental consent. I don't even like birth control pills because they mess with hormones. I don't think people should be able to do sex change procedures until their neocortex finishes developing. People who do this -- as adults -- are not "synthetic humans." Lord have mercy. They are still real humans who have changed their bodies to fit what they feel is best. Not for me, but then neither is the Trad Wife thing, which is 100% "natural." I associate sweeping generalizations with people who might not really be thinking things through. In any case, I am in favor of compassion as much as possible
The term "gender affirming care" sounds like it came out of a Frank Luntz focus group. It's sanitized, euphemistic language that negates the truth of genital mutilation, amputation, lifetime hormone treatments, and much else. The notion of allowing minor children with little to no experience of their bodies and sexualities is incomprehensible in any other paradigm than digital.
тАЬThe body is everywhere assaulted by all of our new media, a state which has resulted in deep disorientation of intellect and destabilization of culture throughout the world. In the age of disembodied communication, the meaning and significance and experience of the body is utterly transformed and distorted.тАЭ